Bruno Latour. “What’s the story?” Organizing as a mode of existence
Тексты / Научно-техническая литература
Published:
Agency without Actors?
New Approaches to Collective Action
Edited by Jan-Hendrik Passoth, Birgit Peuker, Michael Schillmeier
Published 16th January 2012 by Routledge – 224 pages
Series: Routledge Advances in Sociology
Although theories of organizations have analyzed many formal and informal types of organizations, they often fail to follow the specificity of the organizational mode of existence because they suppose the very existence of macro-actors instead of looking at how organizations attempt to solve practically this problem. This essay in organization theory reviews some of the difficulties in tracing the specific path of organizing (taken as a gerund). Using some fresh experience of the author in administration, the paper focuses on the specificity of the organizing script and attempts at isolating this specificity from what sociologists and political scientists have made of it. It shows that it is only once the sociological fallacy of a macro-actor has been put aside, that it is possible to detect the «flip-flopping» that is so peculiar with those scripts the circulation of which generates organizations in their wake without ever relying on macro-actors.
Agency without Actors?
New Approaches to Collective Action
Edited by Jan-Hendrik Passoth, Birgit Peuker, Michael Schillmeier
Published 16th January 2012 by Routledge – 224 pages
Series: Routledge Advances in Sociology
Although theories of organizations have analyzed many formal and informal types of organizations, they often fail to follow the specificity of the organizational mode of existence because they suppose the very existence of macro-actors instead of looking at how organizations attempt to solve practically this problem. This essay in organization theory reviews some of the difficulties in tracing the specific path of organizing (taken as a gerund). Using some fresh experience of the author in administration, the paper focuses on the specificity of the organizing script and attempts at isolating this specificity from what sociologists and political scientists have made of it. It shows that it is only once the sociological fallacy of a macro-actor has been put aside, that it is possible to detect the «flip-flopping» that is so peculiar with those scripts the circulation of which generates organizations in their wake without ever relying on macro-actors.
Оглавление:
| Название | Статус | Активность | Готово | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract | переводится | — | 0% (0 / 4) | |
| Intro | переводится | — | 0% (0 / 24) | |
| SPEAKING ABOUT ORGANIZATION OR SPEAKING TO ORGANIZE | (пусто) | |||
| THE WHOLE IS ALWAYS SMALLER THAN ITS PARTS | (пусто) | |||
Перевод
- Перевод:
- текст с английского на русский
- Создан:
- 13 марта 2012, владелец: Adso
- Права доступа:
-
войти все видеть чужие версии группа скачивать результат все оценивать перевод все комментировать перевод все переводить все читать блог все комментировать блог все писать в блог все анонсировать модераторы редактировать оригинал никто редактировать описание никто управлять группой модераторы Участие в группе нет группы - Готово:
- —