Hkey: переводы

→At least, that is how I see it.

→If you fail the test, she will assume the role of a mother If you pass the test, she MUST assume the role of a lover

→If you fail the test, she will assume the role of a mother If you pass the test, she MUST assume the role of a lover

→Do I HAVE to be your MOTHER or CAN I be your LOVER?

→A test can be looked upon as a question:

→A "TEST": is when a woman says or does something, specifically to evoke a reaction out of a man, whether verbal or action based. It is a SUB-CONSCIOUS mechanism that a woman uses to find out about what kind of man she is dealing with. It is the predictor and basis for all sexual attraction and "love" she will have for a man. Every test is designed to make her feel special (your lover) when a man passes it, or makes her feel unspecial (thus turns her into your mother) if you fail it.

→What exactly defines a test?

→Furthermore, almost all of a woman's tests will come from her subconscious, so you are going to learn how to anticipate what those tests will be, and what she is REALLY asking from you.

→This book is designed to teach men to CONSCIOUSLY understand the communication that a woman SUBCONSCIOUSLY communicates to him in her tests. It is written in a way that the male brain can understand... and a female brain may find totally offensive.

→However, this is a Frank theory, and under Frank's theories rules, it doesn't have to be "True". It just has to WORK. I believe that much of a persons communication is non¬verbal. I take it a little further and claim that much of the communication between a man and a woman is UNCONSCIOUS (or SUB conscious). So much of what a woman tests for isn't directly stated by her verbally; it is coming from an unconscious level of her being.

→I have shown this to a person who is well versed in clinical psychology, and he has informed me that this is clinically incorrect.

→Many of the theories I present in this book are based on the assumption that there is both an conscious mind, and a sub¬conscious mind, and that they are different. For the purposes of clarity, whenever I refer to something that is "SUB" conscious or "UN" conscious, I am referring to the same thing. I make no distinction between those two.

→There is both an Conscious Mind and a Subconscious (aka. Unconscious) Mind

→So if you run into a woman that is the exception to the rule, and you can still connect to her, then by all means, ignore what I say and have a happy life.

→There will usually be an exception to every rule. Regardless of this, rules still apply, and reflect generalizations, and should be noted. Never plan to be, or rely on being, or running into, the exception to the rule. Exceptions to the rule are exceptions, precisely because they do not set out to be exceptions.

→I do not know if anything of what you are about to read is true... I am just sure they worked for me. That is all I care about.

→If these theories allow you to function without resorting to violence, then I think my theories are pretty respectable theories.

→I honestly know that some of the things I believe in are not scientifically proven nor even true for that matter. Thinking the way I do is what has worked for me to get the results I want, without ever having to get violent. What is absolutely necessary for me, is that you are able to function and get results without violence or the use of manipulative drugs and narcotics.

→Theories do not have to be true, they only have to work.

→The Philosophy of Truth in Theories