Lurkmore: Таймлайн судебных исков / Lurkmore: Timeline: 11 мая 2016

Roskomnadzor blocks the “Shoplifting” article by the Tobolsky district court of Tyumen region decision № 2–3073/2015 as of 15.12.2016

Eyjafjallajokull 31.07.16 в 14:50

The Tobolsk court decision is on its website.

Eyjafjallajokull 31.07.16 в 14:51

I wrote a detailed article about this a month ago. It's funny there:

Eyjafjallajokull 31.07.16 в 14:51

The webpage screenshot implies that <address> there is information propagating larceny of goods from malls and shops on the Internet as of DD.MM.YYYY.

Eyjafjallajokull 31.07.16 в 14:57

Articles 158 and 161 of The Criminal Code of Russia impose criminal liability for <data removed> (theft) and open (robbery) larceny. Besides, Article 7.27 of The Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offenses imposes administrative liability for petty stealing.

Eyjafjallajokull 31.07.16 в 15:08

Follow the train of thought: first the court calls the crime description a crime propagation. And then it de facto equalizes the description with the crime itself, referring to the fact theft and robbery lead to criminal liability in Russia.

Eyjafjallajokull 31.07.16 в 15:13

Thus:

Eyjafjallajokull 31.07.16 в 15:13

The court agrees with the prosecutor's argument that when the info propagating theft of goods from malls and shops is publically available on the Internet, de facto it contributes to committing such crimes and offences, thus violating rights of the Russian Federation and general public.

Eyjafjallajokull 31.07.16 в 15:21

The court takes Russian citizens for idiots who would read on the web how to shoplift a chocolate bar — and immediately will go for a theft.

Eyjafjallajokull 31.07.16 в 15:25

Q.: why Roskomnadzor is the defendant? A.: someone has to, and RKN won't object for sure. That's its job — censorship of the web. Good riddance to webpages.

Eyjafjallajokull 31.07.16 в 15:30