Дорожный Контроль / Roadcontrol: Суд отменил УПК

Today, June 3, 2013, we are in the United States

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 05:24

I got this court's decision via the e-mail.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 05:28

I got this copy of the court's decision via the e-mail.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 05:33

The decision of the Pecherski District Court of Kyiv, of the judge Pilaeva.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 05:36

What does this decision tell us?

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 05:39

In fact, the court's decision - the court ruling is a very significant event

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 05:41

in Ukraine.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 05:44

Because, in fact, judge Pilaeva has canceled

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 05:47

the Criminal Procedure Code in Ukraine by this decision.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 05:48

Let me tell you about the main point of this document.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 05:53

Earlier, I've filed a statement to the prosecution agencies

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 05:57

to initiate a criminal case against the three judges of the Kyiv's Court of Appeal.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 06:01

Their surnames are Sitaylo, Frich and Yurdigo.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 06:05

about that, they issued a decision that contradicts another court's decision.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 06:08

In other words, they intentionally commited illegal actions by issuing this decision.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 06:15

Thereby committed a criminal offense, namely-ruling the wittingly unjust decision by a judge.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 06:27

I have filed a petition to the Prosecutor General Office of Ukraine in order to initiate a criminal case against these judges.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 06:34

Of course I realised that nobody wiil put them in prison. But still it was necessary to follow the procedure

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 06:44

and show to the public how they will investigate this case.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 06:46

But what have we got, as the result.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 06:48

The General Prosecutor's Office of Ukraine, sent my statement to the public prosecution office of Kyiv city

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 06:52

the public prosecution office of Kyiv city made a decision that my petition,

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 06:59

won't be registered in the Unified Register of pre-trial investigations.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 07:02

In other words, it is not necessary to register it on the grounds of that all my arguments that were specified in the crime statement,

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 07:14

in the prosecutor's office judgement, they don't see the corpus delicti in my statement.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 07:19

In accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code,

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 08:02

a prosecutor within 24 hours, following receipt of the statement of the crime, must enter data into the Unified Register and begin an investigation.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 08:06

Regardless of what sort of a statement it is and what is written there.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 08:58

If a person entered such a statement and demands to put it into the Unified Register,in this case the prosecutor must do it.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:08

Well, this wasn't done.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:08

Therefore I appealed to Pecherskiy District Court of Kyiv

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:11

with the complaint about the prosecutor's inactivity,

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:13

that he hasn't entered the case in the Unified Register,this is directly prescribed by the law appealing that sort of the prosecutor's inactivity,

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:22

Having examined this case,

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:24

the judge of Pecherskiy court concluded that

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:26

If a judge issues a court's decision

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:30

and a citizen according to the article 375 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:32

Ruling the wittingly unjust decision by a judge.Thinks that this court's decision is criminally

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:38

and files a statment about the crime to prosecution agencies.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:41

Then this statement shouldn't be entered in the Unified Register,

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:44

because the court's decision, is a priori lawful

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:46

and a citizen doesn't have any rights to

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:47

appeal against this court's decision and talk about its illegality.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:50

So, on the one hand the Unified Register,

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:51

and to be more precise the Criminal Procedure Code states that

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:52

a statement should be registered, no matter what.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:54

At the same time,the judge made a ruling,

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 09:55

that in case if you complain against a judge, then your statement won't be entered in the Unified Register.

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 10:00

So,

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 10:00

those innovative

Vladislav55555 06.06.13 в 10:01